Counterstrike
Reflections on 'Blowback' - Lee Harris
It is simply a myth to believe that only interventionism yields unintended consequence, since doing nothing at all may produce the same unexpected results. If American foreign policy had followed a course of strict non-interventionism, the world would certainly be different from what it is today; but there is no obvious reason to think that it would have been better.
Iran: The wrong options on the table
- Spengler
The neo-conservatives "idealists" in the US had an easy, neat and plausible solution to the Middle East in the form of exporting democracy to the region. They were wrong. Similarly, the "realists", who, judging by the recent intelligence estimate on Iran, are in the ascendancy in the Bush administration, have a neat and easy solution - balance of power and deterrence. They are also wrong. There will not be a happy ending.
The abandonment of the Jews - Caroline Glick
The US National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iran's nuclear intentions is the political version of a tactical nuclear strike on efforts to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear bombs.
In Praise of Carbon - John BrignellSuch delicious irony. How is that today's twisted eco-fascists have turned the source of all life into the destroyer of worlds?
Road to Bali - Peter FosterThe issue is not whether humanity will succumb to a "climate crisis," ... it's whether the authoritarian enemies of freedom (who rarely if ever recognize themselves as such) will succeed in using environmental hysteria to undermine capitalism and increase their Majesterium.
Television Networks Fade To Black As The U.S. Surge Succeeds In Iraq - Rich NoyesWinning the war? Who cares about that?
');
echo '
';
CarpCacheShow('http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/rss/');
echo '
';
CarpCacheShow('http://www.steynonline.com/index2.php?option=ds-syndicate&version=1&feed_id=1');
echo '
';
CarpCacheShow('http://www.davidwarrenonline.com/feed.xml');
//echo '
';
//CarpCacheShow('http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/Page/RSS&cid=1123495333258');
//CarpCacheShow('http://rss1.mediafed.com/feed/spectator/the_magazine');
//CarpCacheShow('http://rss1.mediafed.com/feed/spectator/blogs');
//CarpCacheShow('http://www.reason.com/topics/topic/182.xml');
//CarpCacheShow('http://www.reason.com/topics/topic/261.xml');
//CarpCacheShow('http://www.reason.com/topics/topic/150.xml');
// reset maxdesc settings to their defaults
CarpConf('maxidesc','');
echo '
';
CarpCacheShow('http://www.slate.com/rss/feed.aspx?id=2073766');
echo '
';
CarpCacheShow('http://feeds.feedburner.com/knowledgedrivenrevolution/GTiM');
?>
Stop the Masochistic InsanityThe violent response to the report of "Quranic abuse" isn't about faith, it's about intolerance.
By Christopher Hitchens
Posted Monday, May 23, 2005, at 9:16 AM PT
Toward the end of Taliban rule in Afghanistan, when music had already been banned and women excluded from Islamic rituals by being immured in their homes, and when new non-Quranic punishments—such as being buried alive—had been promulgated for homosexuals, an arcane point arose among the fierce Islamists who ran the place: Should paper bags also be haram, or forbidden? The point was an exquisitely delicate one. It was known that such bags were made from recycled paper. It had been alleged that old and torn copies of the Quran had been thrown, or must have been thrown, somewhere and sometime, into the vats of pulp. Was there, therefore, not a real risk that each paper bag might contain a profaned fragment of the divine word? The thought of toilet paper being made in this manner may have been too obscene even to consider, but in the event, paper bags were banned, just as most reading material had already been.
It's essential that we understand the deep irrationality that underlies all faith and that can take these fetishistic forms. That great religion expert Kenneth Woodward, who used to write with extreme lenience on such subjects as miracles (for Newsweek, as it happens), has now written a solemn article for the Wall Street Journal saying that Muslims revere the Quran, or "recitation," much, much more than Christians revere the Bible. The Bible is only a first draft of God's will, set down by mere mortals, whereas the Quran is the unmediated word of God himself. No wonder, then, that pious Muslims will hear of a Newsweek capsule story, assume it to be infallible, and immediately begin to kill and burn. What could be more understandable?
Well, first, most Muslims did not do any such thing, and those who did should not be indulged in the Wall Street Journal. Second, why are we to assume that God speaks only Arabic? Third, are these not the same crowds who believed that all the Jews were ordered to leave the World Trade Center just in time? The truth or otherwise of the story has precious little to do with it. If it had not been this "provocation," it would have been another (such as the claim that the United States sets off the car bombs in Baghdad to give itself an excuse to stick around).
<< Home